It Would Be Funny, If It Weren’t So Sad
New Hampshire state representative Nancy Elliott just realized something. Gay marriage is bad, and needs to be repealed in NH right away:
“And I had to think about it a while. You know, what were we talking about? And so, I started thinking, and, we’re talking about taking the penis of one man, and putting it into the rectum of another man, and wiggling it around in excrement. And you have to think, I’m not sure.. Would I allow that to be done to me? All of us, that could happen to you. Would you let that happen to you? Is that normal? Is that something that we want to portray as the same as the one-flesh union between a man and a woman?”
This is why I can’t take gay marriage opponents the least bit seriously: they assume everyone else is a homophobic moron too. Let’s just examine the tip of the iceberg that is Nancy Elliott’s ignorance:
- Can anyone point out the part in the gay marriage bill that mentions mandatory anal sex? I didn’t think so.
- Surely Nancy would realize, if she had spent as much time thinking about it as she did thinking about penises in rectums, that there are way more heterosexuals having anal sex than homosexuals. Should we ban all buttfuckers from marriage, or just the gay ones?
- I assume this means Nancy has no issue with two women getting married. They are, after all, completely innocent of this abomination Nancy is concerned about.
Oh and Nancy? Just FYI: if there is wiggling and excrement involved in your anal sex, you are doing it wrong.